Rivet analyses referenceSTAR_2009_UE_HELENUE measurement in $pp$ at 200 GeVExperiment: STAR (RHIC) Spires ID: None Status: PRELIMINARY Authors:
Beam energies: (100.0, 100.0) GeV Run details:
WARNING! Mark as "STAR preliminary" and contact authors when using this! UE analysis similar to Rick Field's leading jet analysis. SIScone with radius/resolution parameter R=0.7 is used. Particles with $pT > 0.2 \text{GeV}$ and $|\eta| < 1$ are included in the analysis. All particles are assumed to have zero mass. Only jets with neutral energy $< 0.7$ are included. For the transMIN and transMAX $\Delta(\phi)$ is between $\pi/3$ and $2\pi/3$, and $\Delta(\eta) < 2.0$. For the jet region the area of the jet is used for the normalization, i.e. the scaling factor is $\pi R^2$ and not $\mathrm{d}\phi\mathrm{d}\eta$ (this is different from what Rick Field does!). The tracking efficiency is $\sim 0.8$, but that is an approximation, as below $pT \sim 0.6 \text{GeV}$ it is falling quite steeply. Source code: STAR_2009_UE_HELEN.cc 1// -*- C++ -*-
2#include "Rivet/Analysis.hh"
3#include "Rivet/Projections/ChargedFinalState.hh"
4#include "Rivet/Projections/NeutralFinalState.hh"
5#include "Rivet/Projections/MergedFinalState.hh"
6#include "Rivet/Projections/VetoedFinalState.hh"
7#include "Rivet/Projections/FastJets.hh"
8#include "Rivet/Tools/Random.hh"
9#include "fastjet/SISConePlugin.hh"
10
11namespace Rivet {
12
13
14 /// @brief STAR underlying event
15 ///
16 /// @author Hendrik Hoeth
17 class STAR_2009_UE_HELEN : public Analysis {
18 public:
19
20 /// Constructor
21 RIVET_DEFAULT_ANALYSIS_CTOR(STAR_2009_UE_HELEN);
22
23
24 /// @name Analysis methods
25 /// @{
26
27 void init() {
28 // Charged final state, |eta|<1, pT>0.2GeV
29 const Cut c = Cuts::abseta < 1.0 && Cuts::pT >= 0.2*GeV;
30
31 const ChargedFinalState cfs(c);
32 declare(cfs, "CFS");
33
34 // Neutral final state, |eta|<1, ET>0.2GeV (needed for the jets)
35 const NeutralFinalState nfs(c);
36 declare(nfs, "NFS");
37
38 // STAR can't see neutrons and K^0_L
39 VetoedFinalState vfs(nfs);
40 vfs.vetoNeutrinos();
41 vfs.addVetoPairId(PID::K0L);
42 vfs.addVetoPairId(PID::NEUTRON);
43 declare(vfs, "VFS");
44
45 // Jets are reconstructed from charged and neutral particles,
46 // and the cuts are different (pT vs. ET), so we need to merge them.
47 const MergedFinalState jfs(cfs, vfs);
48 declare(jfs, "JFS");
49
50 // SISCone, R = 0.7, overlap_threshold = 0.75
51 declare(FastJets(jfs, JetAlg::SISCONE, 0.7), "AllJets");
52
53 // Book histograms
54 book(_hist_pmaxnchg, 1, 1, 1);
55 book(_hist_pminnchg, 2, 1, 1);
56 book(_hist_anchg, 3, 1, 1);
57 }
58
59
60 // Do the analysis
61 void analyze(const Event& e) {
62 const FinalState& cfs = apply<ChargedFinalState>(e, "CFS");
63 if (cfs.particles().size() < 1) {
64 MSG_DEBUG("Failed multiplicity cut");
65 vetoEvent;
66 }
67
68 const Jets& alljets = apply<FastJets>(e, "AllJets").jetsByPt();
69 MSG_DEBUG("Total jet multiplicity = " << alljets.size());
70
71 // The jet acceptance region is |eta|<(1-R)=0.3 (with R = jet radius)
72 // Jets also must have a neutral energy fraction of < 0.7
73 Jets jets;
74 for (const Jet& jet : alljets) {
75 if (jet.neutralEnergy()/jet.totalEnergy() < 0.7 && jet.abseta() < 0.3) {
76 jets.push_back(jet);
77 }
78 }
79
80 // This analysis requires a di-jet like event.
81 // WARNING: There is more data in preparation, some of which
82 // does _not_ have this constraint!
83 if (jets.size() != 2) {
84 MSG_DEBUG("Failed jet multiplicity cut");
85 vetoEvent;
86 }
87
88 // The di-jet constraints in this analysis are:
89 // - 2 and only 2 jets in the acceptance region
90 // - delta(Phi) between the jets is > 150 degrees
91 // - Pt_awayjet/Pt_towards_jet > 0.7
92 if (deltaPhi(jets[0].phi(), jets[1].phi()) <= 5*PI/6 ||
93 jets[1].pT()/jets[0].pT() <= 0.7)
94 {
95 MSG_DEBUG("Failed di-jet criteria");
96 vetoEvent;
97 }
98
99 // Now lets start ...
100 const double jetphi = jets[0].phi();
101 const double jetpT = jets[0].pT()/GeV;
102
103 size_t numTrans1(0), numTrans2(0), numAway(0);
104
105 // Calculate all the charged stuff
106 for (const Particle& p : cfs.particles()) {
107 const double dPhi = deltaPhi(p.phi(), jetphi);
108 const double pT = p.pT();
109 const double phi = p.phi();
110 double rotatedphi = phi - jetphi;
111 while (rotatedphi < 0) rotatedphi += 2*PI;
112
113 // @TODO: WARNING: The following lines are a hack to correct
114 // for the STAR tracking efficiency. Once we have the
115 // final numbers (corrected to hadron level), we need
116 // to remove this!!!!
117 if (1.0*rand01() > 0.87834-exp(-1.48994-0.788432*pT)) {
118 continue;
119 }
120 // -------- end of efficiency hack -------
121
122 if (dPhi < PI/3.0) {
123 // toward
124 }
125 else if (dPhi < 2*PI/3.0) {
126 if (rotatedphi <= PI) {
127 ++numTrans1;
128 }
129 else {
130 ++numTrans2;
131 }
132 }
133 else {
134 ++numAway;
135 }
136 } // end charged particle loop
137
138 // Fill the histograms
139 _hist_pmaxnchg->fill(jetpT, double(numTrans1>numTrans2 ? numTrans1 : numTrans2)/(2*PI/3));
140 _hist_pminnchg->fill(jetpT, double(numTrans1<numTrans2 ? numTrans1 : numTrans2)/(2*PI/3));
141 _hist_anchg->fill(jetpT, (double)numAway/(PI*0.7*0.7)); // jet area = pi*R^2
142
143 }
144
145
146 void finalize() {
147 /// @todo Really nothing to do?
148 }
149
150 /// @}
151
152
153 private:
154
155 Profile1DPtr _hist_pmaxnchg;
156 Profile1DPtr _hist_pminnchg;
157 Profile1DPtr _hist_anchg;
158
159 };
160
161
162 RIVET_DECLARE_PLUGIN(STAR_2009_UE_HELEN);
163
164}
|